Zoning: Difference between revisions

From Cvillepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 25: Line 25:


{{clear}}
{{clear}}
==Albemarle County==
==Albemarle County==


Line 34: Line 36:


==Charlottesville==
==Charlottesville==
==History==
===1700's===
==1700's==
In 1762 Charlottesville was founded by an Act of the Assembly as the Albemarle County seat. Charlottesville was established as a gridded town plan from the start. Dr. [[Thomas Walker]] was assigned by the County as Trustee, and a two acre public square was set aside for the courthouse at the northern edge of the fifty acre town. The site for the courthouse was selected on a hillside directly above the gridded village, several blocks above Three Notch'd Road or the main street of town. Over time, business activities around the Court Square included taverns, tailors, milliners, a printing shop, a gunsmith, and a jeweler. A portion of the original courthouse (1803) still stands as a part of the current complex of structures. The original twenty-eight block grid corresponds to the following existing streets: Sixth and McIntire on the east and west respectively, Jefferson and South on the north and south. A plan from 1818 indicated east/west streets as 66 feet in width, while north/south streets as 33 feet wide; this plan also indicated a two block by seven block annexation added directly to the north of the original grid.<ref>http://www2.iath.virginia.edu/schwartz/cville/cville.history.html</ref>
In 1762 Charlottesville was founded by an Act of the Assembly as the Albemarle County seat. Charlottesville was established as a gridded town plan from the start. Dr. [[Thomas Walker]] was assigned by the County as Trustee, and a two acre public square was set aside for the courthouse at the northern edge of the fifty acre town. The site for the courthouse was selected on a hillside directly above the gridded village, several blocks above Three Notch'd Road or the main street of town. Over time, business activities around the Court Square included taverns, tailors, milliners, a printing shop, a gunsmith, and a jeweler. A portion of the original courthouse (1803) still stands as a part of the current complex of structures. The original twenty-eight block grid corresponds to the following existing streets: Sixth and McIntire on the east and west respectively, Jefferson and South on the north and south. A plan from 1818 indicated east/west streets as 66 feet in width, while north/south streets as 33 feet wide; this plan also indicated a two block by seven block annexation added directly to the north of the original grid.<ref>http://www2.iath.virginia.edu/schwartz/cville/cville.history.html</ref>


==1800's==
===1800's===
In [[1854]], the city held its first mayoral election. The mayor-city council form of town government continued until [[1888]], when Charlottesville was incorporated. At this time, a ring of land surrounding the original grid was annexed to create a city of 781 acres. Throughout the early 1800's, business activity and urban development slowly began to shift from Court Square down to the [[Three Notch'd Road]], now called [[Main Street]]. As James Alexander indicates in his Recollections from 1874, "Main Street as It Was in 1828 and as It Is at This Time. - This street, when we first knew it, had few houses, and only two or three business places on it, now it has from one end to the other, fine houses and substantial business stores; then it was rough, and in winter season with mud enough to stall wagons passing over it; now it is macadamized and is well graded; then there were only patches of paved sidewalks, now there are wide sidewalks laid with brick or slate its entire length."
In [[1854]], the city held its first mayoral election. The mayor-city council form of town government continued until [[1888]], when Charlottesville was incorporated. At this time, a ring of land surrounding the original grid was annexed to create a city of 781 acres. Throughout the early 1800's, business activity and urban development slowly began to shift from Court Square down to the [[Three Notch'd Road]], now called [[Main Street]]. As James Alexander indicates in his Recollections from 1874, "Main Street as It Was in 1828 and as It Is at This Time. - This street, when we first knew it, had few houses, and only two or three business places on it, now it has from one end to the other, fine houses and substantial business stores; then it was rough, and in winter season with mud enough to stall wagons passing over it; now it is macadamized and is well graded; then there were only patches of paved sidewalks, now there are wide sidewalks laid with brick or slate its entire length."


Several distinct residential settlements emerged both within the original city grid and around its periphery. [[Park Street]] to the north and [[Ridge Street]] to the south included houses of prominent merchants and businessmen from the city. The westernmost section of downtown called [[Vinegar Hill]] and later [[Random Row]], emerged as a business and residential center largely occupied by portions of the town's black population. Other significant nineteenth century neighborhoods included Belmont, Star Hill, and Fifeville.
Several distinct residential settlements emerged both within the original city grid and around its periphery. [[Park Street]] to the north and [[Ridge Street]] to the south included houses of prominent merchants and businessmen from the city. The westernmost section of downtown called [[Vinegar Hill]] and later [[Random Row]], emerged as a business and residential center largely occupied by portions of the town's black population. Other significant nineteenth century neighborhoods included Belmont, Star Hill, and Fifeville.


===1865-1890's===
====1865-1890's====
After the Civil War land use patterns around Charlottesville began to change. Without access to slave labor, once-wealthy landowners could no longer afford to cultivate large tracts of land. At the same time, Charlottesville was outgrowing its boundaries and began promoting the growth of local industry. Newly established real-estate development companies divided up farmland for industrial usage. By 1890, most of the estates in Albemarle County that ringed Charlottesville no longer belonged to individual farmers. City council refused to annex land unless the conditions of the streets and drainage improvements had been approved by the City Street Committee and sub-division plans were submitted. In turn, developers adapted to the changes in the bureaucratic approval process as well as changes in finance, real estate, and building technology. Developers began to consolidate their development process. Larger Developers, such as the [[Belmont Land Company]], a corporation named after the 551-acre [[Belle Mont estate]] that had been owned by a man named [[Slaughter Ficklin]] and the [[Charlottesville Industrial and Land Improvement Company]] which owned all but 50-60 acres of the [[Rose Hill estate]] land owned by [[John H. Craven]], a farm manager for [[Thomas Jefferson]]'s [[Tufton]] property, bought large estates, subdivided them, laid out the roads, alleys and underground drainage utilities, built houses, set-up building and loan associations and marketed their new neighborhoods. (Source: The City as a Park: A Citizen's Guide to Charlottesville Parks. Prepared by Gregg Bleam Landscape Architects. Historian Aaron Wunsch.)
After the Civil War land use patterns around Charlottesville began to change. Without access to slave labor, once-wealthy landowners could no longer afford to cultivate large tracts of land. At the same time, Charlottesville was outgrowing its boundaries and began promoting the growth of local industry. Newly established real-estate development companies divided up farmland for industrial usage. By 1890, most of the estates in Albemarle County that ringed Charlottesville no longer belonged to individual farmers. City council refused to annex land unless the conditions of the streets and drainage improvements had been approved by the City Street Committee and sub-division plans were submitted. In turn, developers adapted to the changes in the bureaucratic approval process as well as changes in finance, real estate, and building technology. Developers began to consolidate their development process. Larger Developers, such as the [[Belmont Land Company]], a corporation named after the 551-acre [[Belle Mont estate]] that had been owned by a man named [[Slaughter Ficklin]] and the [[Charlottesville Industrial and Land Improvement Company]] which owned all but 50-60 acres of the [[Rose Hill estate]] land owned by [[John H. Craven]], a farm manager for [[Thomas Jefferson]]'s [[Tufton]] property, bought large estates, subdivided them, laid out the roads, alleys and underground drainage utilities, built houses, set-up building and loan associations and marketed their new neighborhoods. (Source: The City as a Park: A Citizen's Guide to Charlottesville Parks. Prepared by Gregg Bleam Landscape Architects. Historian Aaron Wunsch.)


[[File:1895-Charlottesville Industrial and Land Improvement Co. plat layout of Rose Hill.JPG|thumb|400px|right|Mixed-Use plat layout of Rose Hill Subdivion, ca. 1895, ''courtesy of the Albemarle Charlottesville Historical Society'']]
[[File:1895-Charlottesville Industrial and Land Improvement Co. plat layout of Rose Hill.JPG|thumb|400px|right|Mixed-Use plat layout of Rose Hill Subdivion, ca. 1895, ''courtesy of the Albemarle Charlottesville Historical Society'']]


==1900's==
===1900's===


=== 1916 Annexation ===
==== 1916 Annexation ====
In 1916, Charlottesville more than tripled its size with the annexation of the land surrounding the city. By the 1950's the Rose Hill neighborhood had developed into a mixture of working-class housing, small family-owned businesses, boarding houses and several large manufacturing companies built to be served by the rail spurs. As with Preston Avenue, black-owned businesses continued to grown along Rose Hill Drive and Forrest Street (later renamed Forest Street). After WWII, homes were built on parcels which had been designated for commercial/industrial use. Business growth and neighborhood employment opportunities declined with the closing of manufacturing companies, such as the Essex Corp. fountain pens and pencils company, by the 1970's.   
In 1916, Charlottesville more than tripled its size with the annexation of the land surrounding the city. By the 1950's the Rose Hill neighborhood had developed into a mixture of working-class housing, small family-owned businesses, boarding houses and several large manufacturing companies built to be served by the rail spurs. As with Preston Avenue, black-owned businesses continued to grown along Rose Hill Drive and Forrest Street (later renamed Forest Street). After WWII, homes were built on parcels which had been designated for commercial/industrial use. Business growth and neighborhood employment opportunities declined with the closing of manufacturing companies, such as the Essex Corp. fountain pens and pencils company, by the 1970's.   


===1929===
====1929====
The first zoning code was initiated in June 17, 1929 and written by Allen Saville of Richmond, VA. The author argued for single family zoning but after community protest, the initial zoning code had two family residential as the lowest density option. <ref>{{cite-progress-lindsay|title=Altered Zone Law Commission|url=https://search.lib.virginia.edu/catalog/uva-lib:2637683/view#openLayer/uva-lib:2637684/5335.5/4258.5/4/1/1|author=Staff Reports|pageno=1|printdate=June 18, 1929|publishdate=June 18, 1929|accessdate=October 9, 2017 from University of Virginia Library}}</ref>  At this time, zoning restricted businesses from encroaching on white residential areas, but not black ones.<ref name=":0">{{Cite-cville|url=https://www.c-ville.com/zoned-out-how-neighborhood-associations-and-zoning-regulations-have-shaped-our-city/|title=Zoned out: How neighborhood associations and zoning regulations have shaped our city|author=Caris Adel|date=2019-01-23|accessdate=}}</ref>  Within a few years, the black neighborhoods of Kellytown and Tinsleytown (now known as Rose Hill) were disrupted by new industries, such as Monticello Dairy, City Laundry, and the Triangle Service Station on Preston Ave.   
The first zoning code was initiated in ]]June 17]], [[1929]] and written by Allen Saville of Richmond, VA. The author argued for single family zoning but after community protest, the initial zoning code had two family residential as the lowest density option. <ref>{{cite-progress-lindsay|title=Altered Zone Law Commission|url=https://search.lib.virginia.edu/catalog/uva-lib:2637683/view#openLayer/uva-lib:2637684/5335.5/4258.5/4/1/1|author=Staff Reports|pageno=1|printdate=June 18, 1929|publishdate=June 18, 1929|accessdate=October 9, 2017 from University of Virginia Library}}</ref>  At this time, zoning restricted businesses from encroaching on white residential areas, but not black ones.<ref name=":0">{{Cite-cville|url=https://www.c-ville.com/zoned-out-how-neighborhood-associations-and-zoning-regulations-have-shaped-our-city/|title=Zoned out: How neighborhood associations and zoning regulations have shaped our city|author=Caris Adel|date=2019-01-23|accessdate=}}</ref>  Within a few years, the black neighborhoods of Kellytown and Tinsleytown (now known as Rose Hill) were disrupted by new industries, such as Monticello Dairy, City Laundry, and the Triangle Service Station on Preston Ave.   


How 1920s-era zoning laws separated people from what they love about cities. Planning By Christina Sturdivant Sani (Fellow) October 4, 2018 <ref>https://ggwash.org/view/69332/have-you-ever-wondered-why-so-many-american-streets-are-bad</ref>
How 1920s-era zoning laws separated people from what they love about cities. Planning By Christina Sturdivant Sani (Fellow) October 4, 2018 <ref>https://ggwash.org/view/69332/have-you-ever-wondered-why-so-many-american-streets-are-bad</ref>


===1957===
====1957====
[[Image:Bartholomew_letter_zoning_1957.jpg|thumb|300px|left|Letter to Planning Commission from Harland Bartholomew Associates]]
[[Image:Bartholomew_letter_zoning_1957.jpg|thumb|300px|left|Letter to Planning Commission from Harland Bartholomew Associates]]
{{clear}}
{{clear}}
Harland Bartholomew Associates submits a revised draft of the Charlottesville zoning ordinance to the Charlottesville Planning Commission. <ref>{{cite web|title=A Preliminary Report Upon Land Use and Zoning, Charlottesville, Virginia : Prepared for the City Planning Commission|url=https://search.lib.virginia.edu/catalog/u1230874|author=Harland Bartholomew and Associates|work=book and map|publisher=|location=Atlanta|publishdate=1957|accessdate=October 9, 2017}}</ref>
Harland Bartholomew Associates submits a revised draft of the Charlottesville zoning ordinance to the Charlottesville Planning Commission. <ref>{{cite web|title=A Preliminary Report Upon Land Use and Zoning, Charlottesville, Virginia : Prepared for the City Planning Commission|url=https://search.lib.virginia.edu/catalog/u1230874|author=Harland Bartholomew and Associates|work=book and map|publisher=|location=Atlanta|publishdate=1957|accessdate=October 9, 2017}}</ref>


===1964===
====1964====
At their [[June 9]], [[1964]] meeting, the [[City Planning Commission]] proposed an amendment to the zoning code to delete two-family dwellings from the R-1 zone to single-family home and other uses such as schools, churches and parks, that were then allowed. <ref>{{cite-progress-lindsay|title=Amendments to Zoning Code Proposed by City Planners|url=https://v3.lib.virginia.edu/catalog/uva-lib:2681176/view#openLayer/uva-lib:2681197/4083.5/3843.5/3/1/0|author=Staff Reports|pageno=21|printdate=June 10, 1964|publishdate=June 10, 1964|accessdate=June 9, 2021 from University of Virginia Library}}</ref>
At their [[June 9]], [[1964]] meeting, the [[City Planning Commission]] proposed an amendment to the zoning code to delete two-family dwellings from the R-1 zone to single-family home and other uses such as schools, churches and parks, that were then allowed. <ref>{{cite-progress-lindsay|title=Amendments to Zoning Code Proposed by City Planners|url=https://v3.lib.virginia.edu/catalog/uva-lib:2681176/view#openLayer/uva-lib:2681197/4083.5/3843.5/3/1/0|author=Staff Reports|pageno=21|printdate=June 10, 1964|publishdate=June 10, 1964|accessdate=June 9, 2021 from University of Virginia Library}}</ref>


===1991===
====1991====
City Council decided to discourage construction of any types of housing besides single-family homes in the white and relatively wealthy neighborhoods of Fry's Spring, Johnson Village, Lewis Mountain, Venable, Barracks-Rugby, and Greenbrier.<ref name=":0" />  That year, the city instituted a new R-1A single-family zone.  This affected 4,500 parcels of land in the City, lots that had previously been too small for R-1 single-family designation, a process referred to as "downzoning." Proponents of downzoning intended to protect neighborhood stability and encourage homeownership.  Opponents said that single-family zoning is exclusionary and would make housing less affordable.  The change essentially prohibited multifamily apartment buildings in those neighborhoods.
City Council decided to discourage construction of any types of housing besides single-family homes in the white and relatively wealthy neighborhoods of Fry's Spring, Johnson Village, Lewis Mountain, Venable, Barracks-Rugby, and Greenbrier.<ref name=":0" />  That year, the city instituted a new R-1A single-family zone.  This affected 4,500 parcels of land in the City, lots that had previously been too small for R-1 single-family designation, a process referred to as "downzoning." Proponents of downzoning intended to protect neighborhood stability and encourage homeownership.  Opponents said that single-family zoning is exclusionary and would make housing less affordable.  The change essentially prohibited multifamily apartment buildings in those neighborhoods.


In Belmont, one homeowner on Hinton Avenue had converted a single family house to add an independent apartment. The city ordered this to be an illegal action. <ref>{{Minutes-citycouncil|newid=46496|when=January 7, 1991|accessdate=July 3, 2021|id=|url=http://weblink.charlottesville.org/public/0/doc/46496/Page1.aspx}}</ref>
In Belmont, one homeowner on Hinton Avenue had converted a single family house to add an independent apartment. The city ordered this to be an illegal action. <ref>{{Minutes-citycouncil|newid=46496|when=January 7, 1991|accessdate=July 3, 2021|id=|url=http://weblink.charlottesville.org/public/0/doc/46496/Page1.aspx}}</ref>


=====Details=====
On [[January 22]], Council voted 3-2 to deny a resolution to require a notice to all city property owners whose land would be affected by the new zoning map. <ref>{{Minutes-citycouncil|newid=46496|when=January 22, 1991|accessdate=July 3, 2021|id=|url=http://weblink.charlottesville.org/public/0/doc/46498/Page1.aspx}}</ref>
On [[January 22]], Council voted 3-2 to deny a resolution to require a notice to all city property owners whose land would be affected by the new zoning map. <ref>{{Minutes-citycouncil|newid=46496|when=January 22, 1991|accessdate=July 3, 2021|id=|url=http://weblink.charlottesville.org/public/0/doc/46498/Page1.aspx}}</ref>


Line 83: Line 85:
Before their discussion that evening, [[Eugene Williams]] of the [[Dogwood Housing Limited Partnership]] said Council had not done enough to educate people about the plan, which he said would lead to perpetuation of housing discrimination in Charlottesville.
Before their discussion that evening, [[Eugene Williams]] of the [[Dogwood Housing Limited Partnership]] said Council had not done enough to educate people about the plan, which he said would lead to perpetuation of housing discrimination in Charlottesville.


The joint public hearing with the Planning Commission was held on [[May 6]].
The joint public hearing with the Planning Commission was held on [[May 6]]. Reverend Edwards told the audience that the main change was the addition of the R-1A zoning. Speakers in favor of that category included the of the [[Johnson Village Neighborhood Association]], residents of the Fry's Spring neighborhood, the head of the [[Belmont Neighborhood Association]], the president of the [[Venable Neighborhood Association]],
 
Opponents of the zoning included University of Virginia students who were concerned about the impact restricting rentals would have on prices, property owners who felt their rights were being taken away.  <ref name="minutes-19910506">{{Minutes-citycouncil|newid=46512|when=May 6, 1991|accessdate=July 17, 2021|id=46510|url=http://weblink.charlottesville.org/public/0/doc/46512/Page1.aspx}}</ref>


===1998===
At their meeting on [[May 20]], [[1991]], Council discussed the matter again again and approved a motion allowing accessory apartments in structures of at least a 1,600 square feet as long as the owner lived there and there were two off-street parking spaces provided. They held first reading of the zoning map on this date. <ref>{{Minutes-citycouncil|newid=46514|when=May 20, 1991|accessdate=July 17, 2021|id=46514|url=http://weblink.charlottesville.org/public/0/doc/46514/Page1.aspx}}</ref>
 
Council adopted the ordinance on second reading on [[June 3]], [[1991]]. Toscano expressed concern that three recent proposals to build affordable housing were met with opposition from neighbors. <ref>{{Minutes-citycouncil|newid=46516|when=June 3, 1991|accessdate=July 17, 2021|id=46516|url=http://weblink.charlottesville.org/public/0/doc/46516/Page1.aspx}}</ref>
 
=====Individual rezonings=====
* [[May 6]] &ndash; City Council denied rezoning of 324 11th Street NE from R-2 to B-1 <ref name="minutes-19910506" />
 
====1998====
*The [[Charlottesville Planning Commission]] sought to implement a goal to increase home ownership in the city. They brought forth a proposal to rezone 200 properties to restrict them to single family residential. That would have eliminated several commercial uses and lowered density. <ref>{{cite-progress-mg|title=Planners to discuss city zoning proposal|url=|author=Kimberly O'Brien|pageno=|printdate=A|publishdate=|accessdate=February 20, 2016}}</ref>
*The [[Charlottesville Planning Commission]] sought to implement a goal to increase home ownership in the city. They brought forth a proposal to rezone 200 properties to restrict them to single family residential. That would have eliminated several commercial uses and lowered density. <ref>{{cite-progress-mg|title=Planners to discuss city zoning proposal|url=|author=Kimberly O'Brien|pageno=|printdate=A|publishdate=|accessdate=February 20, 2016}}</ref>
*Charlottesville and surrounding Albemarle County adopted Sustainability Accords. <ref>http://old.smartgrowthamerica.org/tag/virginia/</ref>  
*Charlottesville and surrounding Albemarle County adopted Sustainability Accords. <ref>http://old.smartgrowthamerica.org/tag/virginia/</ref>  
===2003===
====2003====
In 2003, the City of Charlottesville [http://www.charlottesville.org/Home/ShowDocument?id=3278 rewrote] its zoning ordinance:  
In 2003, the City of Charlottesville [http://www.charlottesville.org/Home/ShowDocument?id=3278 rewrote] its zoning ordinance:  


Line 96: Line 107:
*New university-specific districts close to grounds: By increasing the number of [[University of Virginia]] students who live near central grounds, the new zoning ordinance has reduced student demand for parking spaces. U.Va Architect [[David Neuman]] reported to the [[Charlottesville Planning Commission]] on June 8, 2010 that "fewer than 10% of the students" use their cars to commute to school.{{fact}}
*New university-specific districts close to grounds: By increasing the number of [[University of Virginia]] students who live near central grounds, the new zoning ordinance has reduced student demand for parking spaces. U.Va Architect [[David Neuman]] reported to the [[Charlottesville Planning Commission]] on June 8, 2010 that "fewer than 10% of the students" use their cars to commute to school.{{fact}}


===Timeline 2003 rezoning===
=====Timeline 2003 rezoning======


*June 2, 2003: Council receives report on new zoning ordinance<ref>[http://weblink.charlottesville.org/DocView.aspx?id=195921 Charlottesville City Council Minutes, 2 Jun. 2003.] City of Charlottesville, Virginia. Retrieved 10 Apr. 2009 </ref>.
*June 2, 2003: Council receives report on new zoning ordinance<ref>[http://weblink.charlottesville.org/DocView.aspx?id=195921 Charlottesville City Council Minutes, 2 Jun. 2003.] City of Charlottesville, Virginia. Retrieved 10 Apr. 2009 </ref>.
Line 105: Line 116:
*September 2, 2003: Council holds additional public hearing and moves ordinance on first reading <ref>{{minutes-citycouncil|when=September 2, 2003|id=195930}}</ref>
*September 2, 2003: Council holds additional public hearing and moves ordinance on first reading <ref>{{minutes-citycouncil|when=September 2, 2003|id=195930}}</ref>


===2007===
====2007====
 
*[[May 1]], [[2007]] &ndash; [[Downtown Design Review Committee|'''Downtown Design Review Committee''']] presents a report to a joint session of the [[Charlottesville Planning Commission|Planning Commission]] and [[Board of Architectural Review]] recommending the maximum height of buildings Downtown be reduced to 70 feet, with north & south streetwall heights of 40 feet and a 25-foot step back.<ref>{{Cite-progress|url=https://www.dailyprogress.com/news/downtown-mall-height-limits-could-become-even-stricter/article_a65e7f98-7c85-5fc3-925f-30f6533abf28.html|title=Downtown Mall height limits could become even stricter|author=Seth Rosen|publishdate=May 1, 2007|accessdate=2019-09-22}}</ref> After discussion, the committee added a provision for special use permits for a fourth story on the Downtown Mall side, with a 45-50' height maximum to "allow for a significant ground floor store front."<ref>{{Minutes-cityplanning|newid=|when=May 1, 2007|accessdate=2019-09-22|url=https://www.charlottesville.org/departments-and-services/departments-h-z/neighborhood-development-services/development-ordinances/city-planning-commission/minutes/2007-minutes/may-1-2007-joint-cpc-bar-meeting}}</ref>
* [[December 11]], [[2007]] &ndash; Planning Commission holds a public hearing for [[zoning text amendment]] ZT-07-12-29. The ordinance would create the [[Water Street Corridor]] and [[South Street Corridor]] zoning district from a portion of the existing [[Downtown Corridor]] zone and split the [[Corner District]] off from the West Main North zone.<ref>{{Agenda-cityplanning|newid=|when=December 11, 2017|accessdate=2019-09-22|url=https://www.charlottesville.org/departments-and-services/departments-h-z/neighborhood-development-services/development-ordinances/city-planning-commission/agendas/2007-agendas/december-11-2007}}</ref>


* May 1, 2007: [[Downtown Design Review Committee|'''Downtown Design Review Committee''']] presents a report to a joint session of the [[Charlottesville Planning Commission|Planning Commission]] and [[Board of Architectural Review]] recommending the maximum height of buildings Downtown be reduced to 70 feet, with north & south streetwall heights of 40 feet and a 25-foot step back.<ref>{{Cite-progress|url=https://www.dailyprogress.com/news/downtown-mall-height-limits-could-become-even-stricter/article_a65e7f98-7c85-5fc3-925f-30f6533abf28.html|title=Downtown Mall height limits could become even stricter|author=Seth Rosen|publishdate=May 1, 2007|accessdate=2019-09-22}}</ref> After discussion, the committee added a provision for special use permits for a fourth story on the Downtown Mall side, with a 45-50' height maximum to "allow for a significant ground floor store front."<ref>{{Minutes-cityplanning|newid=|when=May 1, 2007|accessdate=2019-09-22|url=https://www.charlottesville.org/departments-and-services/departments-h-z/neighborhood-development-services/development-ordinances/city-planning-commission/minutes/2007-minutes/may-1-2007-joint-cpc-bar-meeting}}</ref>
==== 2008 ====
* December 11, 2007: Planning Commission holds a public hearing for [[zoning text amendment]] ZT-07-12-29. The ordinance would create the [[Water Street Corridor]] and [[South Street Corridor]] zoning district from a portion of the existing [[Downtown Corridor]] zone and split the [[Corner District]] off from the West Main North zone.<ref>{{Agenda-cityplanning|newid=|when=December 11, 2017|accessdate=2019-09-22|url=https://www.charlottesville.org/departments-and-services/departments-h-z/neighborhood-development-services/development-ordinances/city-planning-commission/agendas/2007-agendas/december-11-2007}}</ref>


=== 2008 ===
* [[February 12]], [[2008]] &ndash; Commission public hearing scheduled for ZT-07-12-29, deferred prior to the meeting.<ref>{{Minutes-citycouncil|newid=|when=February 12, 2008|accessdate=2019-09-22|url=https://www.charlottesville.org/departments-and-services/departments-h-z/neighborhood-development-services/development-ordinances/city-planning-commission/minutes/2008-minutes/february-12-2008}}</ref>
* [[March 25]], [[2008]] &ndash Planning Commission work session on Downtown & West Main rezoning proposal.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.charlottesville.org/Home/ShowDocument?id=10020|title=10th and Page Neighborhood Issues/Development Update|last=Nick Rogers|first=|publishdate=March 27, 2008|publisher=City of Charlottesville [[Neighborhood Development Services]]|archive-url=|archive-date=|dead-url=|accessdate=2019-09-22}}</ref>
* [[April 8]], [[2008]] &ndash; Planning Commission votes to initiate and approve ZT-07-12-29 on a final vote of 5-1, with [[Cheri Lewis]] dissenting.<ref>{{Minutes-cityplanning|newid=|when=April 8, 2008|accessdate=2019-09-22|url=https://www.charlottesville.org/departments-and-services/departments-h-z/neighborhood-development-services/development-ordinances/city-planning-commission/minutes/2008-minutes/april-8-2008}}</ref>
* [[May 5]], [[2008]] &ndash; Council holds its first reading of the ordinance, voting unanimously to carry it over to its next reading after hearing a presentation from [[Jim Tolbert]] about the 1.5 years of work put into it.<ref>{{Minutes-citycouncil|newid=|when=May 5, 2008|accessdate=2019-09-22|id=351792}}</ref>
* [[May 19]], [[2008]] &ndash; Council adopts the rezoning after removing it from consent agenda.<ref>{{Minutes-citycouncil|newid=|when=May 19, 2008|accessdate=2019-09-22|id=351794}}</ref>
* [[November 3]], [[2008]] &ndash; Council holds first reading of ordinance to adjust allowed densities on West Main and downtown, <ref>{{Minutes-citycouncil|newid=|when=November 3, 2008|accessdate=2019-09-22|id=365905}}</ref>
*[[November 17]], [[2008]] &ndash; Council adopts density changes on its consent agenda.<ref>{{Minutes-citycouncil|newid=|when=November 17, 2008|accessdate=2019-09-22|id=391185}}</ref>


* February 12, 2008: Commission public hearing scheduled for ZT-07-12-29, deferred prior to the meeting.<ref>{{Minutes-citycouncil|newid=|when=February 12, 2008|accessdate=2019-09-22|url=https://www.charlottesville.org/departments-and-services/departments-h-z/neighborhood-development-services/development-ordinances/city-planning-commission/minutes/2008-minutes/february-12-2008}}</ref>
====2013====
* March 25, 2008: Planning Commission work session on Downtown & West Main rezoning proposal.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.charlottesville.org/Home/ShowDocument?id=10020|title=10th and Page Neighborhood Issues/Development Update|last=Nick Rogers|first=|publishdate=March 27, 2008|publisher=City of Charlottesville [[Neighborhood Development Services]]|archive-url=|archive-date=|dead-url=|accessdate=2019-09-22}}</ref>
*Charlottesville and surrounding Albemarle County completed a regional livability plan.<ref>http://old.smartgrowthamerica.org/tag/virginia/</ref> {{fact}}
* April 8, 2008: Planning Commission votes to initiate and approve ZT-07-12-29 on a final vote of 5-1, with [[Cheri Lewis]] dissenting.<ref>{{Minutes-cityplanning|newid=|when=April 8, 2008|accessdate=2019-09-22|url=https://www.charlottesville.org/departments-and-services/departments-h-z/neighborhood-development-services/development-ordinances/city-planning-commission/minutes/2008-minutes/april-8-2008}}</ref>
* May 5, 2008: Council holds its first reading of the ordinance, voting unanimously to carry it over to its next reading after hearing a presentation from [[Jim Tolbert]] about the 1.5 years of work put into it.<ref>{{Minutes-citycouncil|newid=|when=May 5, 2008|accessdate=2019-09-22|id=351792}}</ref>
* May 19, 2008: Council adopts the rezoning after removing it from consent agenda.<ref>{{Minutes-citycouncil|newid=|when=May 19, 2008|accessdate=2019-09-22|id=351794}}</ref>
* November 3, 2008: Council holds first reading of ordinance to adjust allowed densities on West Main and downtown, <ref>{{Minutes-citycouncil|newid=|when=November 3, 2008|accessdate=2019-09-22|id=365905}}</ref>
* November 17, 2008: Council adopts density changes on its consent agenda.<ref>{{Minutes-citycouncil|newid=|when=November 17, 2008|accessdate=2019-09-22|id=391185}}</ref>


===2013===
====2014====
*Charlottesville and surrounding Albemarle County completed a regional livability plan.<ref>http://old.smartgrowthamerica.org/tag/virginia/</ref>
===2014===
Some residents of the [[Fry's Spring neighborhood]] petitioned [[City Council]] to downzone 68 parcels in the neighborhood from R-2 to R-1. City Council voted 3-2 to deny a rezoning on [[September 2]], 2014. <ref>{{cite web|title=Charlottesville City Council Minutes for September 2, 2014|url=http://weblink.charlottesville.org/Public/ElectronicFile.aspx?docid=732400&dbid=0|author=|work=Council Minutes|publisher=|location=|publishdate=|accessdate=April 8, 2019}}</ref>
Some residents of the [[Fry's Spring neighborhood]] petitioned [[City Council]] to downzone 68 parcels in the neighborhood from R-2 to R-1. City Council voted 3-2 to deny a rezoning on [[September 2]], 2014. <ref>{{cite web|title=Charlottesville City Council Minutes for September 2, 2014|url=http://weblink.charlottesville.org/Public/ElectronicFile.aspx?docid=732400&dbid=0|author=|work=Council Minutes|publisher=|location=|publishdate=|accessdate=April 8, 2019}}</ref>
===2015===
 
====2015====
On April 28 and 29, 2015, a technical assistance team from Smart Growth America visited Charlottesville to conduct a Sustainable Land Use Code Audit workshop. Charlottesville was one of 14 communities nationwide selected to receive one of Smart Growth America’s 2015 free technical assistance workshops. <ref>http://old.smartgrowthamerica.org/tag/virginia/</ref>
On April 28 and 29, 2015, a technical assistance team from Smart Growth America visited Charlottesville to conduct a Sustainable Land Use Code Audit workshop. Charlottesville was one of 14 communities nationwide selected to receive one of Smart Growth America’s 2015 free technical assistance workshops. <ref>http://old.smartgrowthamerica.org/tag/virginia/</ref>
===2016===
 
On March 21, 2016 the zoning for [[West Main Street]] was [[West Main Streetscape#Zoning|revised by City Council]], splitting it into East/West districts rather than North/South and lowering allowed heights.<ref name="concept-approved">{{cite web|title=Council chooses path for West Main streetscape, partially approves rezoning|url=http://www.cvilletomorrow.org/news/article/23310-west-main-streetscape-approval/|author=Sean Tubbs|work=News Article|publisher=Charlottesville Tomorrow|location=|publishdate=March 22, 2016|accessdate=December 31, 2016}}</ref> The change followed recommendations made by [[Rhodeside & Harwell]] in the [[West Main Streetscape]] study.
====2016====
===2017===
On [[March 21]], [[2016]] the zoning for [[West Main Street]] was [[West Main Streetscape#Zoning|revised by City Council]], splitting it into East/West districts rather than North/South and lowering allowed heights.<ref name="concept-approved">{{cite web|title=Council chooses path for West Main streetscape, partially approves rezoning|url=http://www.cvilletomorrow.org/news/article/23310-west-main-streetscape-approval/|author=Sean Tubbs|work=News Article|publisher=Charlottesville Tomorrow|location=|publishdate=March 22, 2016|accessdate=December 31, 2016}}</ref> The change followed recommendations made by [[Rhodeside & Harwell]] in the [[West Main Streetscape]] study.
 
====2017====
The ongoing legal audit of the zoning code continued. [[CADRE]] submitted a 16 page letter that commented on the work Robertson had undertaken. <ref>{{cite web|title=LEGAL REVIEW 2017: CADRE COMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS |url=https://cvillepedia.org/images/201705-CADRE-Legal-Review-Comments.pdf|author=|work=|publisher=|location=|publishdate=May 23, 2017|accessdate=August 21, 2020}}</ref>
The ongoing legal audit of the zoning code continued. [[CADRE]] submitted a 16 page letter that commented on the work Robertson had undertaken. <ref>{{cite web|title=LEGAL REVIEW 2017: CADRE COMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS |url=https://cvillepedia.org/images/201705-CADRE-Legal-Review-Comments.pdf|author=|work=|publisher=|location=|publishdate=May 23, 2017|accessdate=August 21, 2020}}</ref>


In 2017, the city considered form-based code in the [[Strategic Investment Area]]. <ref>{{Cite-cville|url=https://www.c-ville.com/new-type-zoning-worries-residents/|title=A new type of zoning worries residents|author=Jordy Yager|date=2017-02-28|accessdate=2019-02-07}}</ref>  Form-based code is a type of zoning ordinance that focuses more on a building’s style and size, and less on its use.  
In 2017, the city considered form-based code in the [[Strategic Investment Area]]. <ref>{{Cite-cville|url=https://www.c-ville.com/new-type-zoning-worries-residents/|title=A new type of zoning worries residents|author=Jordy Yager|date=2017-02-28|accessdate=2019-02-07}}</ref>  Form-based code is a type of zoning ordinance that focuses more on a building’s style and size, and less on its use.  
Line 136: Line 150:
"Among the innovations championed by the New Urbanist or neo-traditional movement, and by many other architects and planners, are "form-based" zoning codes. '''The primary goal of form-based codes is to guide the configuration and architectural quality of urban and suburban environments'''. That '''contrasts with conventional zoning, which often concentrates on the use of buildings, such as whether a block is residential or commercial'''." <ref>https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/realestate/2004/07/24/traditional-zoning-cant-meet-the-challenge-of-modern-development/08753d68-ed3c-49ed-93e4-cfb145eccee0/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.09490cf131ec</ref> By Roger K. Lewis, The Washington Post, July 24, 2004.
"Among the innovations championed by the New Urbanist or neo-traditional movement, and by many other architects and planners, are "form-based" zoning codes. '''The primary goal of form-based codes is to guide the configuration and architectural quality of urban and suburban environments'''. That '''contrasts with conventional zoning, which often concentrates on the use of buildings, such as whether a block is residential or commercial'''." <ref>https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/realestate/2004/07/24/traditional-zoning-cant-meet-the-challenge-of-modern-development/08753d68-ed3c-49ed-93e4-cfb145eccee0/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.09490cf131ec</ref> By Roger K. Lewis, The Washington Post, July 24, 2004.


===2018===
====2018====
Department of Neighborhood Development Services (NDS) Director Alex Ikefuna referred to the zoning ordinance as a "wastebasket of errors.”<ref>{{Cite-progress|url=https://www.dailyprogress.com/news/local/city-zoning-director-calls-ordinance-a-wastebasket-of-errors/article_b3742532-d7eb-11e8-989a-17d6723b1858.html|title=City zoning director calls ordinance a ‘wastebasket of errors’|author=Nolan Stout|publishdate=2018-10-24|accessdate=2019-02-07}}</ref> Ikefuna was making a point that if NDS is to improve its efficiency, the city must update its zoning ordinance.  
Department of Neighborhood Development Services (NDS) Director Alex Ikefuna referred to the zoning ordinance as a "wastebasket of errors.”<ref>{{Cite-progress|url=https://www.dailyprogress.com/news/local/city-zoning-director-calls-ordinance-a-wastebasket-of-errors/article_b3742532-d7eb-11e8-989a-17d6723b1858.html|title=City zoning director calls ordinance a ‘wastebasket of errors’|author=Nolan Stout|publishdate=2018-10-24|accessdate=2019-02-07}}</ref> Ikefuna was making a point that if NDS is to improve its efficiency, the city must update its zoning ordinance.  


<!--In December 2018, Minneapolis City Council passed 2040, a comprehensive plan to permit three-family homes in the city’s residential neighborhoods, abolish parking minimums for all new construction, and allow high-density buildings along transit corridors. Minnesota is a Home Rule state. https://slate.com/business/2018/12/minneapolis-single-family-zoning-housing-racism.html-->
In a sign of things to come, in the December 2018 the Minneapolis City Council passed 2040, a comprehensive plan to permit three-family homes in the city’s residential neighborhoods, abolish parking minimums for all new construction, and allow high-density buildings along transit corridors. Minnesota is a Home Rule state. https://slate.com/business/2018/12/minneapolis-single-family-zoning-housing-racism.html-->
===2019===
 
====2019====
Discussions regarding "upzoning" and "downzoning"  
Discussions regarding "upzoning" and "downzoning"  


==History & Impact==
In May of 1924 the Commerce Department published the "Standard State Zoning Enabling Act" (SZEA) which was widely circulated and adopted by most states. <ref>https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015086414615;view=1up;seq=3</ref>
A new video by the Institute for Humane Studies at '''George Mason University''' shares some history of the impact of car-centric planning and zoning for single-family homes.<ref>https://youtu.be/7pq-UvE1j1Q</ref> {{stub}}


==References==
==References==
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}
<references />
 


[[Category:Zoning]]
[[Category:Zoning]]

Revision as of 16:30, 17 July 2021

Zoning is a land-use regulatory mechanism that determines what can be done with property. This article is intended to be a compendium of zoning history in both Albemarle County and Charlottesville.

2009-City Zoning Map.JPG
2009-City Zoning Map Color Key.JPG
"Zoning" or "to zone" means the process of classifying land within a locality into areas and districts, such areas and districts being generally referred to as "zones," by legislative action and the prescribing and application in each area and district of regulations concerning building and structure designs, building and structure placement and uses to which land, buildings and structures within such designated areas and districts may be put. Virginia Code § 15.2-2201 [1]

The first significant case regarding the relatively new practice of zoning, Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co. (1926), opened the floodgates for use-based zoning in the United States.

The first zoning enabling legislation for Virginia was adopted in 1922 and gradually expanded in scope and coverage until the present framework was adopted in 1962. These basic statutes continue to change in greater or lesser measure with almost every session of the General Assembly. [2]

The Virginia General Assembly has identified the manner in which a locality may exercise its zoning power with great specificity in a number of statutes, including the following:

Code Section Provision
Va. Code § 15.2-2286.1 Clustering single-family dwellings
Va. Code § 15.2-2296 et seq Conditional zoning (proffers)
Va. Code § 15.2-2305 Affordable housing programs
Va. Code § 15.2-2316 Transfer development rights
Va. Code § 15.2-2241-2242 Subdivision housing


Albemarle County

  • November 11, 1977: – Albemarle County Supervisors direct planning staff to work on update of zoning ordinance that would reflect the new Albemarle County Comprehensive Plan. [3]
  • May 14, 1980: – Albemarle County Board of Supervisors hold public hearing on the new zoning ordinance [4]

The Origins of the Zoning Power

Refer to [5] of The Albemarle County Land Use Law Handbook, prepared by Albemarle County Attorney’s Office, published by Albemarle county, July 2019.

Charlottesville

1700's

In 1762 Charlottesville was founded by an Act of the Assembly as the Albemarle County seat. Charlottesville was established as a gridded town plan from the start. Dr. Thomas Walker was assigned by the County as Trustee, and a two acre public square was set aside for the courthouse at the northern edge of the fifty acre town. The site for the courthouse was selected on a hillside directly above the gridded village, several blocks above Three Notch'd Road or the main street of town. Over time, business activities around the Court Square included taverns, tailors, milliners, a printing shop, a gunsmith, and a jeweler. A portion of the original courthouse (1803) still stands as a part of the current complex of structures. The original twenty-eight block grid corresponds to the following existing streets: Sixth and McIntire on the east and west respectively, Jefferson and South on the north and south. A plan from 1818 indicated east/west streets as 66 feet in width, while north/south streets as 33 feet wide; this plan also indicated a two block by seven block annexation added directly to the north of the original grid.[6]

1800's

In 1854, the city held its first mayoral election. The mayor-city council form of town government continued until 1888, when Charlottesville was incorporated. At this time, a ring of land surrounding the original grid was annexed to create a city of 781 acres. Throughout the early 1800's, business activity and urban development slowly began to shift from Court Square down to the Three Notch'd Road, now called Main Street. As James Alexander indicates in his Recollections from 1874, "Main Street as It Was in 1828 and as It Is at This Time. - This street, when we first knew it, had few houses, and only two or three business places on it, now it has from one end to the other, fine houses and substantial business stores; then it was rough, and in winter season with mud enough to stall wagons passing over it; now it is macadamized and is well graded; then there were only patches of paved sidewalks, now there are wide sidewalks laid with brick or slate its entire length."

Several distinct residential settlements emerged both within the original city grid and around its periphery. Park Street to the north and Ridge Street to the south included houses of prominent merchants and businessmen from the city. The westernmost section of downtown called Vinegar Hill and later Random Row, emerged as a business and residential center largely occupied by portions of the town's black population. Other significant nineteenth century neighborhoods included Belmont, Star Hill, and Fifeville.

1865-1890's

After the Civil War land use patterns around Charlottesville began to change. Without access to slave labor, once-wealthy landowners could no longer afford to cultivate large tracts of land. At the same time, Charlottesville was outgrowing its boundaries and began promoting the growth of local industry. Newly established real-estate development companies divided up farmland for industrial usage. By 1890, most of the estates in Albemarle County that ringed Charlottesville no longer belonged to individual farmers. City council refused to annex land unless the conditions of the streets and drainage improvements had been approved by the City Street Committee and sub-division plans were submitted. In turn, developers adapted to the changes in the bureaucratic approval process as well as changes in finance, real estate, and building technology. Developers began to consolidate their development process. Larger Developers, such as the Belmont Land Company, a corporation named after the 551-acre Belle Mont estate that had been owned by a man named Slaughter Ficklin and the Charlottesville Industrial and Land Improvement Company which owned all but 50-60 acres of the Rose Hill estate land owned by John H. Craven, a farm manager for Thomas Jefferson's Tufton property, bought large estates, subdivided them, laid out the roads, alleys and underground drainage utilities, built houses, set-up building and loan associations and marketed their new neighborhoods. (Source: The City as a Park: A Citizen's Guide to Charlottesville Parks. Prepared by Gregg Bleam Landscape Architects. Historian Aaron Wunsch.)

Mixed-Use plat layout of Rose Hill Subdivion, ca. 1895, courtesy of the Albemarle Charlottesville Historical Society

1900's

1916 Annexation

In 1916, Charlottesville more than tripled its size with the annexation of the land surrounding the city. By the 1950's the Rose Hill neighborhood had developed into a mixture of working-class housing, small family-owned businesses, boarding houses and several large manufacturing companies built to be served by the rail spurs. As with Preston Avenue, black-owned businesses continued to grown along Rose Hill Drive and Forrest Street (later renamed Forest Street). After WWII, homes were built on parcels which had been designated for commercial/industrial use. Business growth and neighborhood employment opportunities declined with the closing of manufacturing companies, such as the Essex Corp. fountain pens and pencils company, by the 1970's.

1929

The first zoning code was initiated in ]]June 17]], 1929 and written by Allen Saville of Richmond, VA. The author argued for single family zoning but after community protest, the initial zoning code had two family residential as the lowest density option. [7] At this time, zoning restricted businesses from encroaching on white residential areas, but not black ones.[8] Within a few years, the black neighborhoods of Kellytown and Tinsleytown (now known as Rose Hill) were disrupted by new industries, such as Monticello Dairy, City Laundry, and the Triangle Service Station on Preston Ave.

How 1920s-era zoning laws separated people from what they love about cities. Planning By Christina Sturdivant Sani (Fellow) October 4, 2018 [9]

1957

Letter to Planning Commission from Harland Bartholomew Associates

Harland Bartholomew Associates submits a revised draft of the Charlottesville zoning ordinance to the Charlottesville Planning Commission. [10]

1964

At their June 9, 1964 meeting, the City Planning Commission proposed an amendment to the zoning code to delete two-family dwellings from the R-1 zone to single-family home and other uses such as schools, churches and parks, that were then allowed. [11]

1991

City Council decided to discourage construction of any types of housing besides single-family homes in the white and relatively wealthy neighborhoods of Fry's Spring, Johnson Village, Lewis Mountain, Venable, Barracks-Rugby, and Greenbrier.[8] That year, the city instituted a new R-1A single-family zone. This affected 4,500 parcels of land in the City, lots that had previously been too small for R-1 single-family designation, a process referred to as "downzoning." Proponents of downzoning intended to protect neighborhood stability and encourage homeownership. Opponents said that single-family zoning is exclusionary and would make housing less affordable. The change essentially prohibited multifamily apartment buildings in those neighborhoods.

In Belmont, one homeowner on Hinton Avenue had converted a single family house to add an independent apartment. The city ordered this to be an illegal action. [12]

Details

On January 22, Council voted 3-2 to deny a resolution to require a notice to all city property owners whose land would be affected by the new zoning map. [13]

Council next discussed the matter on April 15.

City Attorney Clyde Gouldman told Council that there were three major revisions in the zoning amendment. These were the addition of the new R-1A zone to limit density in single family neighborhood, new bulk and height regulations, and a rewriting of the historic preservation section to designate individual properties.

Councilor Bitsy Waters offered an amendment to reinstate a B-5 district, allow accessory apartments limited to 400 square feet in existing structures in excess of 2,000 square feet and on lots of 6,000 square feet, and to allow duplexes in existing units of 2,400 square feet on lots of 7,200 square feet.

Councilor Kay Slaughter supported the apartments if the home was owner-occupied and that could help with homeownership. Councilor Tom Vandever expressed doubt and said that might not protect neighborhoods near the University of Virginia. Councilor David Toscano said he would support the R-1A designation but he had reservations. Councilor Alvin Edwards also supported R-1A. [14]

Before their discussion that evening, Eugene Williams of the Dogwood Housing Limited Partnership said Council had not done enough to educate people about the plan, which he said would lead to perpetuation of housing discrimination in Charlottesville.

The joint public hearing with the Planning Commission was held on May 6. Reverend Edwards told the audience that the main change was the addition of the R-1A zoning. Speakers in favor of that category included the of the Johnson Village Neighborhood Association, residents of the Fry's Spring neighborhood, the head of the Belmont Neighborhood Association, the president of the Venable Neighborhood Association,

Opponents of the zoning included University of Virginia students who were concerned about the impact restricting rentals would have on prices, property owners who felt their rights were being taken away. [15]

At their meeting on May 20, 1991, Council discussed the matter again again and approved a motion allowing accessory apartments in structures of at least a 1,600 square feet as long as the owner lived there and there were two off-street parking spaces provided. They held first reading of the zoning map on this date. [16]

Council adopted the ordinance on second reading on June 3, 1991. Toscano expressed concern that three recent proposals to build affordable housing were met with opposition from neighbors. [17]

Individual rezonings
  • May 6 – City Council denied rezoning of 324 11th Street NE from R-2 to B-1 [15]

1998

  • The Charlottesville Planning Commission sought to implement a goal to increase home ownership in the city. They brought forth a proposal to rezone 200 properties to restrict them to single family residential. That would have eliminated several commercial uses and lowered density. [18]
  • Charlottesville and surrounding Albemarle County adopted Sustainability Accords. [19]

2003

In 2003, the City of Charlottesville rewrote its zoning ordinance:

  • Increased mixed use zoning throughout the city
  • Increased the by-right density in many locations. [citation needed] The allowable number of unrelated people within a household was reduced from four to three in R-1U and R-1US university residential zoning districts.[20]
  • Entrance corridor overlay along main roads. [1]
  • New university-specific districts close to grounds: By increasing the number of University of Virginia students who live near central grounds, the new zoning ordinance has reduced student demand for parking spaces. U.Va Architect David Neuman reported to the Charlottesville Planning Commission on June 8, 2010 that "fewer than 10% of the students" use their cars to commute to school.[citation needed]
Timeline 2003 rezoning=
  • June 2, 2003: Council receives report on new zoning ordinance[21].
  • July 7, 2003: Council holds a public hearing on the new zoning ordinance [20]
  • July 17, 2003: Council holds a work session to go through details of suggested ordinance [22]
  • July 21, 2003: Council holds additional discussion on the rezoning [23]
  • August 4, 2003: Council holds additional discussion [24]
  • September 2, 2003: Council holds additional public hearing and moves ordinance on first reading [25]

2007

2008

  • February 12, 2008 – Commission public hearing scheduled for ZT-07-12-29, deferred prior to the meeting.[29]
  • March 25, 2008 &ndash Planning Commission work session on Downtown & West Main rezoning proposal.[30]
  • April 8, 2008 – Planning Commission votes to initiate and approve ZT-07-12-29 on a final vote of 5-1, with Cheri Lewis dissenting.[31]
  • May 5, 2008 – Council holds its first reading of the ordinance, voting unanimously to carry it over to its next reading after hearing a presentation from Jim Tolbert about the 1.5 years of work put into it.[32]
  • May 19, 2008 – Council adopts the rezoning after removing it from consent agenda.[33]
  • November 3, 2008 – Council holds first reading of ordinance to adjust allowed densities on West Main and downtown, [34]
  • November 17, 2008 – Council adopts density changes on its consent agenda.[35]

2013

  • Charlottesville and surrounding Albemarle County completed a regional livability plan.[36] [citation needed]

2014

Some residents of the Fry's Spring neighborhood petitioned City Council to downzone 68 parcels in the neighborhood from R-2 to R-1. City Council voted 3-2 to deny a rezoning on September 2, 2014. [37]

2015

On April 28 and 29, 2015, a technical assistance team from Smart Growth America visited Charlottesville to conduct a Sustainable Land Use Code Audit workshop. Charlottesville was one of 14 communities nationwide selected to receive one of Smart Growth America’s 2015 free technical assistance workshops. [38]

2016

On March 21, 2016 the zoning for West Main Street was revised by City Council, splitting it into East/West districts rather than North/South and lowering allowed heights.[39] The change followed recommendations made by Rhodeside & Harwell in the West Main Streetscape study.

2017

The ongoing legal audit of the zoning code continued. CADRE submitted a 16 page letter that commented on the work Robertson had undertaken. [40]

In 2017, the city considered form-based code in the Strategic Investment Area. [41] Form-based code is a type of zoning ordinance that focuses more on a building’s style and size, and less on its use.

"Among the innovations championed by the New Urbanist or neo-traditional movement, and by many other architects and planners, are "form-based" zoning codes. The primary goal of form-based codes is to guide the configuration and architectural quality of urban and suburban environments. That contrasts with conventional zoning, which often concentrates on the use of buildings, such as whether a block is residential or commercial." [42] By Roger K. Lewis, The Washington Post, July 24, 2004.

2018

Department of Neighborhood Development Services (NDS) Director Alex Ikefuna referred to the zoning ordinance as a "wastebasket of errors.”[43] Ikefuna was making a point that if NDS is to improve its efficiency, the city must update its zoning ordinance.

In a sign of things to come, in the December 2018 the Minneapolis City Council passed 2040, a comprehensive plan to permit three-family homes in the city’s residential neighborhoods, abolish parking minimums for all new construction, and allow high-density buildings along transit corridors. Minnesota is a Home Rule state. https://slate.com/business/2018/12/minneapolis-single-family-zoning-housing-racism.html-->

2019

Discussions regarding "upzoning" and "downzoning"


References

  1. https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title15.2/chapter22/section15.2-2201/
  2. http://mccandlishlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Virginia-Planning-and-Zoning-Law1.pdf
  3. Web. County of Albemarle, Albemarle County Board of Supervisors Minutes, Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, Albemarle County, November 11, 1977, retrieved July 15, 2019.
  4. Web. County of Albemarle, Albemarle County Board of Supervisors Minutes, Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, Albemarle County, , retrieved July 17, 2019.
  5. https://www.albemarle.org/upload/images/Forms_Center/Departments/County_Attorney/Forms/LULH_Consolidated.pdf Chapter 2: The Origins of the Zoning Power
  6. http://www2.iath.virginia.edu/schwartz/cville/cville.history.html
  7. Web. Altered Zone Law Commission, Staff Reports, Daily Progress Digitized Microfilm, Lindsay family, June 18, 1929, retrieved October 9, 2017 from University of Virginia Library. Print. June 18, 1929 page 1.
  8. 8.0 8.1 Web. Zoned out: How neighborhood associations and zoning regulations have shaped our city, Caris Adel, C-VILLE Weekly, Portico Publications, 2019-01-23
  9. https://ggwash.org/view/69332/have-you-ever-wondered-why-so-many-american-streets-are-bad
  10. Web. A Preliminary Report Upon Land Use and Zoning, Charlottesville, Virginia : Prepared for the City Planning Commission, Harland Bartholomew and Associates, book and map, Atlanta, 1957, retrieved October 9, 2017.
  11. Web. Amendments to Zoning Code Proposed by City Planners, Staff Reports, Daily Progress Digitized Microfilm, Lindsay family, June 10, 1964, retrieved June 9, 2021 from University of Virginia Library. Print. June 10, 1964 page 21.
  12. Web. Charlottesville City Council meeting minutes, .pdf, Council Chambers, City of Charlottesville, January 7, 1991.
  13. Web. Charlottesville City Council meeting minutes, .pdf, Council Chambers, City of Charlottesville, January 22, 1991.
  14. Web. Charlottesville City Council meeting minutes, .pdf, Council Chambers, City of Charlottesville, April 15, 1991.. . Also available in older archive.
  15. 15.0 15.1 Web. Charlottesville City Council meeting minutes, .pdf, Council Chambers, City of Charlottesville, May 6, 1991.. . Also available in older archive.
  16. Web. Charlottesville City Council meeting minutes, .pdf, Council Chambers, City of Charlottesville, May 20, 1991.. . Also available in older archive.
  17. Web. Charlottesville City Council meeting minutes, .pdf, Council Chambers, City of Charlottesville, June 3, 1991.. . Also available in older archive.
  18. Print: Planners to discuss city zoning proposal, Kimberly O'Brien, Daily Progress, Media General A, Page .
  19. http://old.smartgrowthamerica.org/tag/virginia/
  20. 20.0 20.1 Web. Charlottesville City Council meeting minutes, .pdf, Council Chambers, City of Charlottesville, July 7, 2003.
  21. Charlottesville City Council Minutes, 2 Jun. 2003. City of Charlottesville, Virginia. Retrieved 10 Apr. 2009
  22. Web. Charlottesville City Council meeting minutes, .pdf, Council Chambers, City of Charlottesville, July 17, 2003.
  23. Web. Charlottesville City Council meeting minutes, .pdf, Council Chambers, City of Charlottesville, July 21, 2003.
  24. Web. Charlottesville City Council meeting minutes, .pdf, Council Chambers, City of Charlottesville, August 4, 2003.
  25. Web. Charlottesville City Council meeting minutes, .pdf, Council Chambers, City of Charlottesville, September 2, 2003.
  26. Web. Downtown Mall height limits could become even stricter, Seth Rosen, Daily Progress, Lee Enterprises, May 1, 2007, retrieved 2019-09-22.
  27. Web. Charlottesville Planning Commission meeting minutes, .pdf, City of Charlottesville, May 1, 2007.
  28. Web. Agenda for December 11, 2017 Charlottesville Planning Commission, City of Charlottesville, December 11, 2017., retrieved 2019-09-22.
  29. Web. Charlottesville City Council meeting minutes, .pdf, Council Chambers, City of Charlottesville, February 12, 2008.
  30. Web. 10th and Page Neighborhood Issues/Development Update, City of Charlottesville Neighborhood Development Services, March 27, 2008, retrieved 2019-09-22.
  31. Web. Charlottesville Planning Commission meeting minutes, .pdf, City of Charlottesville, April 8, 2008.
  32. Web. Charlottesville City Council meeting minutes, .pdf, Council Chambers, City of Charlottesville, May 5, 2008.
  33. Web. Charlottesville City Council meeting minutes, .pdf, Council Chambers, City of Charlottesville, May 19, 2008.
  34. Web. Charlottesville City Council meeting minutes, .pdf, Council Chambers, City of Charlottesville, November 3, 2008.
  35. Web. Charlottesville City Council meeting minutes, .pdf, Council Chambers, City of Charlottesville, November 17, 2008.
  36. http://old.smartgrowthamerica.org/tag/virginia/
  37. Web. Charlottesville City Council Minutes for September 2, 2014, Council Minutes, retrieved April 8, 2019.
  38. http://old.smartgrowthamerica.org/tag/virginia/
  39. Web. Council chooses path for West Main streetscape, partially approves rezoning, Sean Tubbs, News Article, Charlottesville Tomorrow, March 22, 2016, retrieved December 31, 2016.
  40. Web. LEGAL REVIEW 2017: CADRE COMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS, May 23, 2017, retrieved August 21, 2020.
  41. Web. A new type of zoning worries residents, Jordy Yager, C-VILLE Weekly, Portico Publications, 2017-02-28, retrieved 2019-02-07.
  42. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/realestate/2004/07/24/traditional-zoning-cant-meet-the-challenge-of-modern-development/08753d68-ed3c-49ed-93e4-cfb145eccee0/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.09490cf131ec
  43. Web. City zoning director calls ordinance a ‘wastebasket of errors’, Nolan Stout, Daily Progress, Lee Enterprises, 2018-10-24, retrieved 2019-02-07.